Users don’t think about trust until something breaks

⏱︎

Read time:

1–2 minutes

Users are like elephants. They don’t forgive and they don’t forget.

That moment when a user pauses and wonders whether your product is actually safe is the moment you spend years trying to prevent. Because once the question enters their head, you’ve already lost something you can’t fully get back… Trust. 

I spent a long time working on security products at Google, and one thing that stuck with me is that trust isn’t a feature. You can’t add it to a roadmap or announce it in a launch. It builds up slowly, through thousands of small decisions made consistently over time.

Look at LastPass after their 2022 data breach. They had genuinely loyal users, people who had recommended the product to friends, trusted it with their most sensitive information, and used it for years. Many left almost immediately. Not because the product had stopped working. But because the one thing a password manager can’t afford to lose is your data.

Trust building is slow and invisible. It’s difficult. It doesn’t move a metric the way a new feature does. It’s nearly impossible to attribute to any single decision. So teams underinvest in it, not out of carelessness, but because the incentives don’t reward it.

Practically speaking, don’t discount the little things:

  • Scope permission requests tightly to what you actually need, nothing more.
  • Make loading states reassuring, not anxiety-inducing.
  • Sweat the moments of friction your team has gone blind to, because new users are forming permanent judgments in seconds.

Stripe is a good example of this done right. Their error messages are famous among developers because they tell you exactly what went wrong and how to fix it, no jargon, no blame-shifting. Nobody shipped that in a press release. But it’s a huge part of why developers trust Stripe with their payments infrastructure.

Categories: ,

Subscribe

* indicates required

Intuit Mailchimp